HIGHLIGHTS
- who: David Guez from the SchoolThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia have published the article: Is reasoning in rats really unreasonable? Revisiting recent associative accounts, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- what: The first, addressed in Experiment 1, is that if the authors demonstrate that the outcome of two effective causes of an outcome (here footshock) is not additive the authors should be able to abolish blocking. Imagining multiple iterations of the model at the phase level is far less reasonable.
- how: Simulation of experiment 1 For all the simulations the authors used the . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.