HIGHLIGHTS
- What: Since the Court has not clearly stated what the purpose of Article 82(1) of the Convention is, this article will first explore the purpose of the provision and review the background of its establishment. The Court found that, in the circumstances of the case, Article 82(1) of the Convention did not serve the purpose for which it was intended. This is, on the contrary, more conducive to taking into account the interests of developing countries and the common heritage of mankind and realizing the purpose of the regime of contributions under Article 82(1 . . .

If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.