HIGHLIGHTS
- What: The authors propose that this conversational switching paradigm could be used as a conceptually more ‘true` measure of language control. The authors investigate whether the observed local language control (i.e., switch costs) is partly a side effect of laboratory conditions that create artificial obstacles that increase switch costs compared to language switching in a natural context. The authors first discuss why auditory question cues facilitate language choice compared to auditory but arbitrary cues, next the authors discuss how questions modulate local and global BLC mechanisms compared to arbitrary cues and, lastly, the authors reflect on . . .

If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.