Mental capacity law, autonomy, and best interests: an argument for conceptual and practical clarity in the court of protection

HIGHLIGHTS

  • who: Mental capacity and collaborators from the Health and Regulation Unit, University of Liverpool, on, –, September There are no ethicalUniversity of Bristol School, Bristol, UK have published the research work: MENTAL CAPACITY LAW, AUTONOMY, AND BEST INTERESTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR CONCEPTUAL AND PRACTICAL CLARITY IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
  • what: To reach that conclusion, the article aims first for conceptual clarity. The law's paradigmatic position asks that the authors attempt to apply the patient's reflectively endorsed values, whether these are inferred directly by asking for consent (in the case . . .

     

    Logo ScioWire Beta black

    If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

    Thanks :)

    If you don't have an account, you can create one here.

     

Scroll to Top

Add A Knowledge Base Question !

+ = Verify Human or Spambot ?