HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The EBM movement claims that the best way to innovate is to apply new scientific results to medical practice or policy-making (D`Andreta et_al, 2013). In the clinical sector, this time lag is estimated to be around 17 years1 (Balas and Boren, 2000; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001; Morris et_al, 2011). The difficulties have been conceptualized as a "knowledge-to-action" (KTA) gap between scientific results and practical applications (Rynes et_al, 2001; Rushmer et_al, 2019). But Newell et_al`s findings challenge this logic, suggesting that . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.