HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
It seems as if Caimi just takes this putatively unaccounted-for logical move at face value. 7, Núm. 2: 462-481 ISSN-e: 2445-0669 DOI 10.7203/REK.7.2.22126 Apperception and Object-Comments on Mario Caimi`s Reading of the B-Deduction have a reference to something else" (2014, p 37). Caimi proceeds to make a point of distinguishing between ways of synthesising representations which establish whether representations are either "utterly subjective (i.e., nothing but modifications of the Self)" or indeed "possess objective validity". The transitional passage at the . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.