HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
Though formal CBPR methods are less common in global settings, studies in LMIC have demonstrated that engaging stakeholders can increase the relevance and "fit" of HIC-developed EBTs (e_g, ), stakeholder engagement in these contexts has typically involved adapting EBTs for cultural acceptability (e_g, ). Engagement methods were categorized as follows: quantitative (i.e., surveys), qualitative (e_g, semi-structured interviews or focus groups), mixed-methods, or other (e_g, collaborative workshops without formal qualitative data collection or analysis; advisory boards). The noted lack of discussion of impacts of stakeholder engagement is likely a result of the current . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.