HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
If the authors focus on subjects completing the whole TTT game (Fig 7b), H3.ii is verified for moves/hands ratio but not for time/hands ratio: inexpert routinized and inexpert creative subjects show a similar time/hands ratio (33.94 vs. 34.97, p-value=0.001) and the former performs significantly worse in terms of higher moves/hands ratio (7.11 vs. 6.61, p-value=0.096). Moving to expert subjects, Fig 7a shows that routinized subjects perform significantly better than creative ones in terms of lower time/hands ratio (28 . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.