A forgotten logical expressivist: strawson’s philosophy of logic and its challenges

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Sybren Heyndels from the make explicit facts about the underlying (and also the extended) consequence relation and incoherence property(Hlobil, p., ) While (i) corresponds to the idea that logical vocabulary can be elaborated from relations of material consequence (and incompatibility), and (ii) corresponds to the idea that logical vocabulary expresses these relations (while staying in the objectlanguage), Hlobil`s definition does not include the further statement that the relations of material consequence (and incompatibility) specified in (i) are also constitutive of the propositional content paradigmatically expressed by declarative sentences. Unlike Brandom, Strawson is not a semantic . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.