Fitch’s paradox and truthmaking: why jago’s argument remains ineffective

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Fredrik Nyseth from the Recently, there have been several attempts to use the kind of reasoning found in Fitch`s knowability paradox to argue for rather sweeping metaphysical claims: Jago (2020) uses such reasoning to argue that every truth has a truthmaker, and Roberto Loss (2021) does so to argue that every fact is groundedThis strategy has been criticized by Robert Trueman (2021), who points out that the same kind of reasoning could be used to establish entirely opposite conclusions. In response, Jago (2021) has offered a revised argument that is meant to avoid Trueman`s . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.