HIGHLIGHTS
- What: This study compared the effectiveness of two intubation devices. By conducting a prospective randomised controlled study comparing video laryngoscopy and video stylet in patients with simulated cervical spine fracture injuries, the authors aimed to address several key questions. The authors aimed to assess the safety profiles of both modalities by examining rates of procedural complications, such as oesophagal intubation, dental trauma, and hemodynamic instability. By evaluating the efficacy and safety of the C-MAC video laryngoscope and the Karl Storz video stylet in achieving successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt, this study provided evidence-based . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.