HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Ana Iriarte Díez from the The different treatment of Arabic varieties in this classification-despite the abundant examples of CI available in CA and MSA-could be explained by either (a) an excessive reliance on the joint grammatical traditional label of mafQūl mutlaq, or by (b) insufficient research on CIs in the different Arabic varieties (including the spoken varieties) and/or an overgeneralization of the scarce available data. Be what it may, both of these factors, probably fueled by ideological biases, may have led to an excessive reliance on formal features (in this case . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.