HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Gerhard Schmalz from the The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of University of Leipzig, Germany (No:, ek)This study compared two randomly assigned groups using either the PRISM method (group A) or a numeric scale (group B) for interviews during one term of their clinical course. All participants were informed verbally and in writing and provided their written informed consent. Participants and groups have published the research: Comparison of PRISM and numeric scale for self-assessment of learning progress during a clinical course in undergraduate dental students . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.