Comparison of rigid and elastic registration methods in software-based targeted prostate biopsy: a multi-center cohort study

HIGHLIGHTS

• What: These scores were then used to determine the nearest Mahalanobis distance between units in the study, and a caliper with a standard deviation of 0.05 was applied to exclude units whose propensity score difference was larger than the caliper. This study showed that the RR and ER systems had similar success regarding the csPC detection rate. To minimize the effects of the study`s limitations, the authors aimed to make the heterogeneous structure of the cohort as homogeneous as possible by using the propensity score match method.
• Who: SERHAT ÇETİN et al . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or E-mail:

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.