HIGHLIGHTS
- What: In this study, the analysis was carried out by junior doctors with a lack of experience, and the diagnostic accuracy was lower than that of experienced ultrasound doctors. ② Compared with the relevant studies of Chen and Li et_al , the diagnostic efficacy of the GI-RADS classification in this study for distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal tumors was lower for the following reasons: ① The results of this study showed that the model had good performance in distinguishing benign masses from borderline, metastatic and malignant masses (AUC between 0.891 and 0.990). Compared with the relevant studies . . .

If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.