HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Evan Mayo-Wilson from the (UNIVERSITY) have published the research work: Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- how: As another example the authors compared systematic reviews of the drug gabapentin and found that different types of harms and different effect estimates were reported across reviews that included the same primary studies .
SUMMARY
In many cases, separate systematic reviews would be preferable to combined reviews of both benefits and harms. The authors use "harms" broadly to refer to outcomes . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.