HIGHLIGHTS
- What: Critical terrorism studies (CTS), in this analysis, has been as guilty as more mainstream approaches to terrorism research, meaning that it risks reproducing the epistemic and political violences it has long made an effort to critique. Questions around what it is for which the authors should strive have implications, in turn, for how the authors evaluate the success or failure of critical scholarship:122 is the (belated) acceptance of critical terrorism arguments indicative of the former or the latter?
- Who: Lee Jarvis and colleagues from the School of Social and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough . . .

If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.