Design modification of the retort burner for phytomass in a small heat source

HIGHLIGHTS

• What: The co-combustion and additional cooling were not effective, as a solution, the authors propose to supplement the retort burner with a device capable of removing the formed deposits in regular intervals, which would enable the combustion of even less quality alternative pellets. Due to the temporal course of the thermal power of the heat source in individual cocombustion measurements, where the power fluctuated due to the formation of deposits and their disruption at intervals of 15 min, the authors propose more frequent disruption, every 10 min. To evaluating emissions, heat output, and the formation of . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.