Editorial: single-blind or double-blind review processes?

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Susanne Prediger from the TU Dortmund University, IPN Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Berlin, Germany have published the research: Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
• what: More importantly, it is difficult for reviewers to ascertain whether the contribution is adding value compared to older work and to ensure that too large overlaps or self-plagiarism is detected.

SUMMARY

Editorial: Single‑blind or double‑blind review processes? Following the discussion behind that editorial, the authors have been considering whether ESM should keep using . . .

 



If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

Thanks :)

Username or E-mail:

If you don't have an account, you can create one here.