HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Kassoum Kayentao u200d u200d and colleagues from the remained unchangedAs participants that reported a pregnancy in the, u00admonth survey were excluded from the main analytical cohort, we explored if selection bias could explain the observed results. A comparison of key characteristics among those excluded (12-u00admonth survey participants) with those who were included (24-u00admonth and, u00admonth survey participants) does not show considerable difference. Including, u00ad month survey participants to the main analytical cohort did not alter the effect of intervention. Furthermore, a proportion (12%-, %) of the control participants received proactive home visits by CHWs. We . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.