HIGHLIGHTS
- What: In the experiment, half of the sample was randomly assigned to provide their own reasons for perceiving either climate change (Issue 1) or illegal immigration (Issue 2) as dangerous and to describe the emotional responses they associated with the issue (the Self-Raters). To these substantive implications, this paper also makes a methodological contribution by demonstrating how mentalising accuracy can be explored empirically. This research has also shown that the dispositional tendency to mentalise54 generally mimics the experimentally induced effects of effort. The aim of this study was to provide a better understanding of the link . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.