HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The objective was to estimate differences between TF1-9 from existing WaSH coverage distributions and TF1-9 when hypothetical interventions raised coverages of nearby face-washing water and latrine use. The authors separately analyzed EUs that had not yet met the elimination target (TF1-9 and amp;lt;5%) and EUs that had met this target. The hypothetical interventions were operationalized by identifying EUs with coverage below a target and then predicting overall prevalence, had those EUs been brought up to the coverage target. If=3 surveys were conducted in an EU and the . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.