False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt): what can we learn from a meta-analyses on > 750,000 tests?

HIGHLIGHTS

  • who: Thomas Liehr from the Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum, Jena, Germany have published the Article: False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what can we learn from a meta-analyses onu2009>u2009750,000 tests?, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
  • what: This study identified among the 1400 papers 24 original and one review paper which were suited to re-evaluate the efficacy of > 750 000 published NIPT-results.
  • how: As the authors state NIPT has a minimal false positive rate and no own . . .

     

    Logo ScioWire Beta black

    If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

    Thanks :)

    If you don't have an account, you can create one here.

     

Scroll to Top

Add A Knowledge Base Question !

+ = Verify Human or Spambot ?