HIGHLIGHTS
- What: For assessment of feasibility and postoperative outcomes, the authors aimed to compare either the same muscle mass assessment tool as used for the intervention or the currently accepted ‘gold standard` modalities of CT or MRI. As the review assessed diagnostic testing, domain 2 (bias in selection of participants) was amended accordingly to determine whether patient selection reflected the wider hip fracture population.
- Who: James Prowse from the University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK have published the article: Feasibility, acceptability and prognostic value of muscle mass and strength measurement in patients with hip fracture: a systematic . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.