HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
While a full discussion of the reasons for ethics creep are beyond the scope of this article (see Haggerty, 2004), these interventions have serious consequences, including preventing research with key populations on critical issues (De Vries et_al, 2004; Langlois, 2011; Lincoln and amp; Tierney, 2004; Mathews et_al, 2022; Wynn, 2011; Yeater et_al, 2012). Critiques include that RECs impose conditions based on assumptions about the likelihood of adverse participant experiences rather than evidence (Dazzi et_al, 2014; Mathews et_al, 2022; Yeater et_al, 2012); are inappropriate to participants and study design (Schrag, 2011); and highly inconsistent across . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.