In vitro versus in vivocellulose microfibrils from plant primary wall synthases: structural differences*

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Jose̕phine Lai-Kee-Him from the vitro product did not yield any, di-O-acetyl-2, , tetra-Omethyl glucitol (Fig2). These data allow us to conclude that the DPn of the corresponding sample was high, since , is considered to be the lower detection limit of the method. Reasons to account for the difference in crystallinity and chemical sensitivity of the two samples can be proposed. Despite their morphological similarity, the in vitro and endogenous cellulose microfibrils differ markedly in their state of aggregation. In the wall of R. fruticosus cultured cells, as in other plant . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.