HIGHLIGHTS
- who: UDC et al. from the (UNIVERSITY) have published the article: ISSN 2079-0023 (print), ISSN 2410-2857 (online) u0412u0456u0441u043du0438u043a u041du0430u0446u0456u043eu043du0430u043bu044cu043du043eu0433u043e u0442u0435u0445u043du0456u0447u043du043eu0433u043e u0443u043du0456u0432u0435u0440u0441u0438u0442u0435u0442u0443 u00abu0425u041fu0406u00bb. u0421u0435u0440u0456u044f: u0421u0438u0441u0442u0435u043cu043du0438u0439 24 u0430u043du0430u043bu0456u0437, u0443u043fu0440u0430u0432u043bu0456u043du043du044f u0442u0430 u0456u043du0444u043eu0440u043cu0430u0446u0456u0439u043du0456 u0442u0435u0445u043du043eu043bu043eu0433u0456u0457, u2116 2 (8)u20192022 UDC 519.2 DOI: 10.20998/2079-0023.2022.02.04, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- what: The approach proposed by Kullback to assessing the informativeness of indicators has obvious shortcomings. The authors determine the areas under the curves given by the functions uf06d H1 ( x) and uf06d H 2 ( x).
- how: Fourthly the Kullback measure is designed . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.