On human rights law review (2022) 1-8 the judicial discretion of the european court of human rights: the of plenty and the in this issue we have the pleasure to host two thoughtful and expertly written guests on judicial discretion exercised by the european court of human rights (ecthr the court)

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: ∵, and Lean, Years from the rules and regulations that allow interpreters to exercise wider discretionIndeed, among other possible reasons [1] human rights rules are designed to be general enough so that they can find abundant applications in everyday life. They have to be flexible in order to remain relevant by accommodating multitudes of various sets of facts and circumstances and by applying to diverse contexts. This in turn can open the ‘floodgates' of conceptualisations, delimitations, and, more generally, interpretations. For instance, we think that it is hardly contestable that the privacy of correspondence should equally cover . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or E-mail:

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.