HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The contemporary one health movement has been defined as an instrumental approach to augmenting public health by enhancing health at the human-animal-environment interface. In this respect, the collaborative approach to one health has been cautiously welcomed, but critically relies on the assumption that "optimal health" is exclusively a matter for human beings, despite other plausible interests at the environmental nexus. In this respect, I presume that ethical biases toward cultural (or social) determinants of health influence one health as it is currently practiced, thus defining its scope as an environmental philosophy. So . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.