HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
Previous studies have reviewed the literature on paradoxes and tensions at organizational level (e_g, Schad et_al 2016; Putnam et_al 2016). In the topic field, the authors searched for terms used in other studies to identify the area of interorganizational relationships (e_g, Agostini and Nosella 2019; Agostini et_al 2020). Of 17 Several authors presented the concept of paradox as the presence of elements that oppose and contradict themselves (e_g, Schad et_al 2016; Smith and Lewis 2011). As anticipated, the most common paradoxes found in the literature review were cooperation vs. competition (e_g, Gnyawali et_al 2016 . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.