Personal ethical settings for driverless cars and the utility paradox: an ethical analysis of public attitudes in uk and japan

HIGHLIGHTS

SUMMARY

    The German Ethics Commission produced a report indicating (rule 9) that driverless cars should not sacrifice pedestrians to save occupants. In an attempt to help guide the development of driverless cars, some empirical work has examined the views of the general public on how they think such cars should respond to collisions (their "Moral Algorithm Preference"). Overall Personal ethical setting for driverless cars these studies suggest that the public may find it acceptable for driverless cars to be programmed with algorithms designed to minimise overall casualties, leading some to suggest that cars should be . . .

     

    Logo ScioWire Beta black

    If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

    Thanks :)

    If you don't have an account, you can create one here.

     

Scroll to Top

Add A Knowledge Base Question !

+ = Verify Human or Spambot ?