Putting the ‘experiment’ back into the ‘thought experiment’

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Thought experiment Internal validity and colleagues from the (UNIVERSITY) have published the paper: Putting the u2018Experimentu2019 back into the u2018Thought Experimentu2019, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
• what: In this article, I proposed to re-frame the debate on TEs on the basis of the distinction between internal and external validity, borrowed from the parallel distinction employed in the philosophical literature about material experiments.
• future: In contrast with Meynell I contend that this approach gives the authors just half the story further work is needed to analyse the external validity of TEs and to . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.