HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Thought experiment Internal validity and collaborators from the (UNIVERSITY) have published the research work: Putting the u2018Experimentu2019 back into the u2018Thought Experimentu2019, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- what: In this article, I proposed to re-frame the debate on TEs on the basis of the distinction between internal and external validity, borrowed from the parallel distinction employed in the philosophical literature about material experiments.
- future: I suggest that a fruitful way to improve the current situation is to focus on the experimental nature of thought experimentation and more specifically on a fundamental but . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.