HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The authors propose to integrate these ten "logographic duplicates" under their corresponding "syllabic" entry: e_g, both CH 013 and *152 will be classified as CH 013, and so forth. Rare sign shapes, and especially hapax shapes, signs of problematic reading (for example, damaged instances), and signs that might be LA rather than CH indeed skew the evidence. If two shapes coexist in the same inscription or in a set of homogeneous inscriptions (on similar media with a similar paleographic style), and have distinct traits, then most probably are different graphemes (e_g 031 and 032 . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.