HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Neil Sinclair from the Department of Philosophy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham , RD, UK have published the paper: Reasons, inescapability and persuasion, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- what: The paper is in substantive disagreement with the hybrid descriptive/expressive account of reason statements given by Ridge, which takes such statements to express both beliefs concerning standards and endorsements of such standards (Ridge 2014: 37, 123-123). The claim that reason statements are ‘factive' in this way is questioned by Suikkanen (2012: 599), but this argument can be countered by providing a more fine-grained account of . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.