Remote synchronous usability testing of public access defibrillators during social distancing in a pandemic

HIGHLIGHTS

SUMMARY

The study was executed in two parts: Protocol 1 was an in-person usability study of the HeartSine SAM 500P (HeartSine, Belfast, Northern Ireland), and Protocol 2 was a remote usability study of the same device, conducted using video-conferencing software. While there was no difference in the time taken to the turn on the AED in the in-person study versus remote study, the time taken to place the pads was lower in the in-person study testing. The authors observed that 3 (16.7%) participants in Protocol 1, and 2 (11.1 . . .

 



If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

Thanks :)

Username or Email

Password

Remember me

Lost your password?

If you don't have an account, you can create one here.