Reply to onkenhout et al. comment on “van gemert et al. child abuse, misdiagnosed by an expertise center—part ii—misuse of bayes’ theorem. children 2023, 10, 843”

HIGHLIGHTS

• What: The severe conclusions of Prinsen on the study of abuse by Alink and colleagues, e_g_[4], that their method was not usable for the general Dutch population, focusing on prevention of and intervention in child abuse, was the reason the authors chose the other papers for the physical abuse incidence calculations.
• Who: Martin J. C. van Gemert and collaborators from the DepartmentAmsterdam University Amsterdam, AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands have published the paper: Reply to Onkenhout et al. Comment on “van Gemert et al. Child Abuse, Misdiagnosed by an Expertise Center—Part II—Misuse of . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or E-mail:

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.