HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
Review of: "Naturalism`s maxims and its methods. Is naturalistic philosophy like science?" Anna Alexandrova1 1 University of Cambridge Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare. It deserves to be published. The example in section 3.2 is not an appropriate standard against which to judge naturalistic philosophy. But it`s still good to be reminded that ‘naturalistic philosophy` as a label is vague and can be misleading. (To post this review I was required to provide a rating of this paper out of five stars. I wouldn`t have agreed to . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.