Sanctioned quotas versus information provisioning for community wildlife conservation in zimbabwe: a framed field experiment approach

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Herbert Ntuli from the (Ntuli and Muchapondwa, )To mimic reality, participants were only informed about the policy with a sole focus on the elephants (i.e., there was no further information about the pastures). In the information provisioning intervention, participants were told that there is a threshold below which the growth rate of both elephants and pastures drops drastically. Hence, in this intervention, groups faced resource dynamics with a threshold. This treatment is similar to that of Lindahl et_al (2016b). However, in that study, participants only faced one resource instead of the two connected resources. Given . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or Email

  Password

  Remember me

  Lost your password?

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.