HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Tim Smartt from the The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia have published the research: Scepticism about epistemic blame, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
- how: I take it those sympathetic to Brown`s view cannot avoid this objection just by accepting the general idea of blame in various domains they need to show that Sher`s framework can be used to develop plausible accounts of various species of blame.
SUMMARY
In this paper I advocate scepticism about epistemic blame; the view that the authors have good reason to think . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.