HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
In the recent past, the forests of Manna ash and other tree species such as Oriental hornbeam, Tatarian maple, Common hornbeam, elm, etc. were considered a passing historical stage in the development of forestry and a bad legacy of previous political regimes (Georgiev et_al, 1965). According to Erbakamov et_al in silvicultural practice, Manna ash is perceived as an undervalued species, which is primarily due to its low productivity despite its high natural regenerative capacity and its wide range associated with the ecological plasticity of the species. Aleksandrov and Genov refer Manna ash to the . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.