HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
To assess the validity of the MFFT-2021, the authors obtained comparison data from the study by Viator et_al, who used a 20-item version of the MFFT based on images found via Internet searches and references from previous research (Kagan et_al, 1964; Cairns and Cammock, 1978; Carretero-Dios et_al, 2008; Caswell et_al, 2015; Ramaekers et_al, 2016). As done in prior studies employing the MFFT, the authors measured performance based on accuracy (fewer errors indicate more reflection/less impulsivity) and response time to first selection (slower response indicates more reflection/less impulsivity; Leshem and . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.