HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
Note that throughout this paper I will mostly refer to natural language sentences instead of e_g utterances of them. I will ignore related metaphysical questions including e_g questions about what sentences are or about propositions and their relation to natural language sentences and sentences of formal languages. The sort of arguments the authors encounter in everyday life, e_g in discussions with neighbours and friends or in political debates, rarely fit into just one of these categories. It has this status in virtue of some of its formal properties-classical first-order logic is e_g . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.