HIGHLIGHTS
- who: Utilitas, and Nathan, Cofnas from the Balliol College, Oxford, UK have published the article: The Golden Rule: A Naturalistic Perspective, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
SUMMARY
Huemer (2005: 217) contrasts "moral beliefs about incest, special obligations to family, and reproductive practices," which may have plausible evolutionary explanations, with acceptance of the Golden Rule, which does not. According to de Lazari-Radek and Singer (2012; 2014), the fact that thinkers in different traditions agree that the Golden Rule is the ‘essence of morality' has no plausible naturalistic (i.e., debunking) explanation and is evidence . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.