HIGHLIGHTS
- What: The authors aim to determine whether G and amp;S testing is conducted as a precautionary measure rather than a necessity by auditing all appendicectomies (including diagnostic laparotomies and cases converted to open appendicectomies) performed over a 12-month period and by assessing whether observed rates of significant blood loss align with published findings. This analysis provides a clear overview of cost allocation across the tests, which can aid in budgeting and resource planning. The findings of the study demonstrate a negligible rate of transfusion, which highlights the low risk of significant bleeding associated with LAs . . .

If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.