HIGHLIGHTS
- What: The aim of this paper is to direct attention to the fact that, even if the authors are initially inclined to accept the proposed analogies between humans, other animals and robots, there are two rarely discussed points of disanalogy that seem significant enough to severely disrupt these analogies and, as a result, block the identified routes to moral consideration. The character the authors develop supervenes on the interactions with the robot as a nonunique token of a type, but the character itself, created through the imaginative process of anthropomorphism, belongs to the human that creates it . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.