HIGHLIGHTS
- who: UC Irvine et al. from the University of have published the research work: UC Irvine, in the Journal: (JOURNAL) of March/26,/2013
- what: This study compared two methods of intraosseous insertion, the drill-assisted IO needle and the manual IO needle. The study provided inexperienced resident physicians the opportunity to train with both needles on a live swine model.
- how: Resident responses in the survey show that the drillassisted IO device is preferred over manual insertion in novice users.
- future: Studies are needed to compare the rate of complications . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.