HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The authors develop models that untangle the network effects of productivity defined as paper counts, and prominence referring to high-impact publications, of individual scientists from their collaboration networks. The authors find that gendered differences in the productivity and prominence of mid-career researchers can be largely explained by differences in their coauthorship networks. This selection preserves and focuses the analysis on the most important collaboration links according to common coauthorship norms in STEM fields, e_g, traditional mentor-mentee relationships, where the junior scholar is typically the first author and their senior colleague is . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.