When is a learning object not an object: a first step towards a theory of learning objects

HIGHLIGHTS

• who: Mike Sosteric and Susan Hesemeier from the Athabasca University, Canada, Canada's Open University have published the research: When is a Learning Object not an Object: A first step towards a theory of learning objects, in the Journal: (JOURNAL)
• what: In an attempt to capture their true nature, the authors provide an overview of learning objects. In short, without knowing more about CS's application of object oriented programming, how can the authors assess the appropriateness of CS theory to the understanding of learning objects? In the quote from Friesen an attempt is made . . .
  

   

  

  If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!

  Thanks :)

  Username or E-mail:

  If you don't have an account, you can create one here.