HIGHLIGHTS
SUMMARY
The German Ethics Commission produced a report indicating (rule 9) that driverless cars should not sacrifice pedestrians to save occupants. In an attempt to help guide the development of driverless cars, some empirical work has examined the views of the general public on how they think such cars should respond to collisions (their "Moral Algorithm Preference"). Overall Personal ethical setting for driverless cars these studies suggest that the public may find it acceptable for driverless cars to be programmed with algorithms designed to minimise overall casualties, leading some to suggest that cars should be . . .
If you want to have access to all the content you need to log in!
Thanks :)
If you don't have an account, you can create one here.